|
Reference Guide to Emerging
Technologies to Implement NEPA
Novel Science as Evidence
FAQ
Evidentiary Hurdles to Introducing Novel Scientific
Information
The complexity of the information flow exposes vulnerability
to evidentiary challenges. The use of digital technologies
in performing tasks or making decisions that are susceptible
to legal dispute presents significant challenges to
the courts in understanding how the information was
derived, processed and presented, and in weighing the
probative value of the information against its potential
to confuse. There is tremendous opportunity for technologies
to enable more informed, cost-effective decisions, but
it is important to recognize evidentiary issues of credibility,
authenticity, acceptability that may impede the integration
of these technologies into the routine operations performed
by public and private environmental stewards.
1. What are the some
of the potential evidentiary issues associated with
using remote sensing and other digital earth science
information in a court of law?
2. How do the Federal
Rules of Evidence treat the use of remote sensing information?
3. Survey of Court Cases that
Consider Remote Sensing Data as Evidence.
The
materials on this Web site were developed by Ken Markowitz
as part of a presentation at the ALI-ABA
Course of Study: Environmental Impact Assessment: NEPA
(National Environmental Policy Act) and Related Requirements,
December, 2001, Washington, DC.
© 2002 Earthpace
LLC and ELIS. All rights reserved. Not for reproduction
without the express written approval from Earthpace, LLC
and ELIS. |